n3wt0n!

This screenshot is going to look familiar.

It will look very similar to this image.

So what’s the difference? Well, the previous image shows off a very inefficient 55878 polygons with 579 nodes. The image above proudly displays a much more efficient 3417 polygons with only 16 nodes.

You may notice the right hand side, there’s an inconsistency with one of the sub-maps (a recursed AccessibleAreaMap) that appears to have stopped rotating when there was still room to continue mapping. Likewise in the top-right area. So there is still room for further improvements.

At the very least, I’m happy that the AccessibleAreaMap generation happens almost instantaneously where previously it took at least a few seconds. Rendering the AccessibleAreaMap also no longer strains the loop.